Monday, December 13, 2010
What have i learned this semester?
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
How does mass media shape the publics agenda of issues?
Throughout this course, the idea that media shapes the values and effects people has been drilled into us constantly. As we learned in earlier chapters there are gatekeepers and all different types of censors on what kind of news can be told and what cannot be told.
Agenda setting, the idea that media tells people what to think about is the major force in mass media. The media today easily shapes the publics agenda of issues. If there is news on the war over seas or another scandalous issue with the president, the media will most likely choose to tell the public about the scandalous issue about the president. The media wants to tell the people the news they believe is the most important or the most though provoking. When the public watches they news they don’t have a choice in what they are told. What they hear is what they hear.
The effect that this has on the public is grand. The public get used to hearing similar news over and over again, so they start to only worry about certain things more than others. Then when the news tells them about another type of issue they take it a lot harder because it is so different from what they are used to hearing.
Something that I worry about now is how the long term effects of media will impact us later. Will we still be strongly influenced by the media? Will we ever realize the effects of the media and stop? What can we do to change this?
Friday, December 3, 2010
How does mass media shape the public’s agenda of issues?
Media is a main form of communication especially for public issues. Because of this, newspapers, news stations, radio and other forms on media, have the chance to choose what stories are brought to the audience’s attention. Agenda setting is when media tells people what to think, not what to think about. This is used during status conferral, when the media attention enhances attention given to people, subjects, and issues. The media choose which topics to emphasize. By amplifying certain topics, the audience sees them as more important or urgent and they remember more about it after seeing it. They do not tell them to think these things, but through status conferral, they set the public’s agenda.
The CNN effect is the ability of television, through emotion-raising video, to elevate distant issues on domestic public agenda. This can cause the viewers to think more critically or some situations. It is proven that the media can provoke emotion in the audience. The news and newspapers are such prominent forms of communication about public issues. They are sometimes the only resources we have to base our opinions on. This makes it easy to create framing, the selecting of a perceived reality for emphasis in a mass media message, thereby shaping how the audience sees the reality. Because we get most of our information from the news and the paper, they control how we see certain issues.
How does Mass Media shape the public’s agenda?
It has been established as a fact that today’s society relies heavily on the media, whether it is to get daily news, to gain information on a hot topic or to be entertained. The public first goes to the media to learn about what’s going on. This gives an enormous amount of power to the media because they decide what to put on the front page of a newspaper. They decide what news story to cover over the weekend and which one to begin with on Monday morning. They choose the person to interview or investigate upon and expose. Mass media does shape the public’s agenda in a fearfully influential way. We are mere followers of what they show us. People seldom form their own views nowadays because opinionated knowledge is constantly handed to them. Will we loose our ability to think and critically analyze due to this growing problem? The question remains unanswered but we should become aware that the media has a big say in the public’s agenda and that at some point it might become an issue.
What is the significance of the first amendment with speech and press?
The first amendment prohibits government interference in free expression, religion and individual and public protests against government policies. The freedom expression provision is the First Amendment ban against government abridgement of freedom of speech and freedom of press. Freedom of expression was limited in the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. However, the government cannot suppress a publication in advance. Government restrictions can be justified in a time of war. An action has to pass the Incitement Standard, a four-part test, to determine whether an advocacy speech is constitutionally protected.
In the press, this gives the press the freedom to work as a watchdog against the government. This makes investigative journalism possible. This is beneficial to the people because unlike authoritarians, the government cannot censor certain articles that portray them negatively. In speech, this gives people the right to state their own opinions without having repercussions. Yet, public endangerment is not permitted. You cannot yell “fire” in a crowd of people. You can speak your opinion about heath care at an event.
What is the significance of the First Amendment with speech and press?
What is the significance of the first amendment with speech and press?
The foremost and most obvious significance of the first amendment with speech and press is the right to free expression. The first amendment strongly stresses free expression and since that is such a powerful bond with the media, the amendment and the press are significantly linked to one another. The first amendment protects the media and allows for a “market place of ideas” as John Milton said.
It definitely is beneficial to some extent because there is an endless pool or opinions and views out there. Nevertheless, it can cause many problems because people might feel that they are protected no matter what they do or say even if it meant saying something wrong that can jeopardize someone else’s life.
How does mass media reflect a political system globally?
The mass media reflects a political system globally because media and democracy are so intertwined. They rely on each other and mirror one another. The more freedom the media and press has the more liberal a country is. In a kingdom or dictatorship for example, the media would definitely have more restrictions. This is how media reflects political systems. Even within the US, different states have different political stances and thus the media exposed in each state varies from conservative or liberal thinking.
Authoritarian governments control their media and censorship is very high in those countries. China, for instance, experiences extreme control and regulation from the government. The media has virtually no freedom and the people don’t know anything about the outside world. Here, the media reflects a strict and severe government that does not allow liberal thought.
Thursday, December 2, 2010
How does mass media reflect a political system globally?
Media freedom determines the rights of citizens within a country’s political system. Libertarianism emphasizes the ability of the people to reason their own way to right conclusions and therefore believes humans are capable of their own governance. This would be democracy. There is an emphasis on liberty and individual rights. This includes the first amendment, the free expression section of the U.S. Constitution. Democracy and freedom are prominent in Western and East-central Europe. These places experience more freedom as citizens and in the media. There is free and open exchange of information and ideas.
Contrastingly, there is authoritarianism. These have leaders are in control. These are countries that are ruled by dictators like Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. In authoritarianism there is strong control of and censorship media. Authorities have to preview material before dissemination. Authoritarians think that people should be praised if they support the government. Those who are unfaithful or criticize the government should be banished. These citizens are controlled more that libertarianism citizens. They do now have the freedoms in media or government that we as American citizens have. They are sheltered from events happening in the media that the government views as negative. For example, the Chinese government limited Internet communication, especially from outside the country. They say it is to eliminate false news, superstition, or obscenity. It is also used to control media messages and shelter the audience.
How does the mass media shape the public's agenda of issues?
What is the significance of the fourth estate?
The fourth estate is the press as a player in medieval power structures in addition to the clerical, noble, and common estates. The term is applied to all journalistic activity today. Its job is to monitor the other branches as an external check on behalf of the people. It has adapted the watchdog role. That is the concept of the press as a skeptical and critical monitor of the government. An example of this is investigative journalism and The Hummel Report. Their job is to uncover things about the government or on goings that are not covered by major news stations. This is beneficial to the people because we have few ways of uncovering these things ourselves and criticizing the government. Things like Watergate would not be revealed if it weren’t for journalists who ask as watchdogs.
What are some mass media effects and their impact on society?
Mass media effects several aspects of society, especially because it has been a prominent thing in our lives for so long. Firstly, media effects our lifestyle, specifically socialization which is learning to fit into society. The socialization process expands to include the influence of friends, neighbors, schools and at some point mass media. Children no longer need to read to be involved in mass media so they are involved at younger ages than before. They spend more time watching television than anything else by the time they reach 18. They take more from television than they do from their parents now. Television teaches them values and they mimic what they see. Another thing that media effects is attitude. Media can portray messages to large volumes of people. Exposure of certain subjects in the media portrayed positively or negatively can cause the audience to change their opinion suddenly or over time. In our culture, media impacts our behavior. We received our core values from books written in the past, mostly religious books like the bible. Values are also transmitted through communities. Music, fashion, and pop culture are communicated and spread though mass media communications.
Which audience analysis measurement principles and techniques are most effective and why?
Probability sampling is an effective analysis measurement principle. Probability sampling is when everyone in the population being surveyed has an equal chance to be sampled. It is a technique that includes the public opinion polling which relies on statistical extrapolation that can be very accurate. Probability sampling uses sample size, sample selection, margin of error, and confidence level to create accurate surveying. It is found that 384 people should be surveyed to provide 95% confidence that results have less than a 5% margin of error.
An effective technique is polling. Polling includes interviews, diaries, meters, people meters, and portable meters. These are the primary techniques that can be used in combination. For polling media forms meters, people meters, and portable meters are used to track television and radio channels that are being watched. These are more reliable than diaries and interviews because they can constantly track channels inside and outside of the home.
What Have I Learned in this Class?
How does mass media shape the public’s agenda of issues?
How does mass media shape the public's agenda of issues?
Mass media shapes the public’s agenda of issues in many ways. Mass media is very influential in society because it is all around us. Most of the public believes everything the media says because it is delivered to us in some many forms multiple times. The media also has control over what they tell us, so they can chose to lie or tell the truth. Not really lie, but beat about the truth. They control is the public is fully aware of what is really going on, or not at all. They control the issues we hear about or not. That is why the public is very dependent on the media every day. The media is the primary source of information. They are a role model. Because they are so depended on, the media gets in trouble if they make mistakes or lie. They have a code of ethics to follow. The media also sets the standards in society. The showcase how people should look, act, eat. The media has a very strong effect on the public because of it’s strong influence. But they do look out for the common good of the people.